D.C. Council approves Commanders stadium deal, return to district

Washington DC – Washington Commander Going home The DC Council voted between the team and the city to approve a deal, paving the way for the franchise to return to the district.

The council voted 9-3-required a two-thirds majority-to approve plans for a football stadium on that site where the franchise enjoyed its best days.

The council should vote again on September with this measure, but many sources involved in this process said that the team has been told that it could move forward with their plans after Friday’s vote, knowing that the second vote is expected to result in the same results.

Washington announced a deal to build a stadium with the city, where RFK Stadium – It still sits home from 1961 to 1996. Property of 174 acres will become a mixed-use facility with housing development, a sports complex and retail shops.

Commander will invest $ 2.7 billion to build the stadium – and will cover the cost overran – while the district will contribute $ 1 billion. The team has targeted 2030 for a long time because the year a stadium should be opened, in large parts so that it can host big events such as the Women’s World Cup in 2031.

DC Mayor Muril Boseer told ESPN last month that she feels “very good” until the stadium was being opened and said, “I think it could happen faster.”

Bausar said that the team could start the infrastructure work “in the early part of the next year and the next year this time the ground will be shovel.”

The stadium will be domed, and when they do not deny a withdrawal roof, the cost of one – as well as the potential returns – is likely that a source with a source of prohibitory, status.

The commanders considered living in their current home in Landover, Maryland, but the owner Josh Harris and his employees focused on returning to RFK first. The team will continue training in its Ashburn, Virginia, convenience and will be the team headquarters in the college park, Maryland. Harris has said that he wants to represent all of “DMV” – District, Maryland and Virginia.

But RFK has always been an emotional site for franchise fans – Haris grew up as a team fan and participated in sports in the stadium. From 1972 to 1992, Washington played in five super bowles and won three and tolerated only two losing sessions. RFK became the advantage of a separate home area, with its intimate settings and some movable stands that could bounce fans.

But former owner Jack Kent Cook did not find a new stadium built in the district and was paid for the current to be built in Maryland. Since opening a suburban stadium in 1997, the organization has posted only eight winning sessions and reached Postsen seven times. Washington moved beyond 12–5 in the last season and reached the NFC Championship game, where she lost to Philadelphia.

Returning to the district was just two-plus years ago, with several sources at the time it was considered a distant third part of the sites in Maryland and Virginia. But a major chain of events was followed: Dan snider kept the team for sale; In July 2023, Harris buying it; And the Congress is leasing the federal land in the district for the next 99 years.

There were also final-minute deals with members of the council. Council President Phil Mendelson said at a news conference last week that the regenerated terms would be purified to the city for about 779 million dollars in 30 years – which could come from revenue and/or other costs.

Parking revenue was also re -organized, now capable of imposing 18% tax with the district – as is in its other parking garage. That money will be used for maintenance of the stadium.

Bausar influenced the council that the city will immediately benefit from the stadium being created due to immediate employment generation. The study of a budget office of the council stated that a new stadium resulted in economic benefits compared to the development of a mixed use six years ago.

Some members feared what would happen if there was no vote. No other private investor has come forward with another proposal for property.

“The option is that we are still talking about this in 10 years,” a member said.

Source link

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *