When George Floid protests took place and some protesters decided to attack people or destroy the property, did you consider that political violence? When 2017 Charlotsville, Wa. In the correct rally, resulting in Heather Hair Killed badly by a carDid you consider that political violence? When the protesters at Los Angeles threw bricks and bottles in immigration and customs enforcement agents, did you consider that political violence? When Trump supporters came to the capital on 6 January, did you consider that political violence? The answer of all of them is yes.
We have been living in the era of political violence for some time, and politicians, pundits, social media companies and affected have told us that the violence has been one -sided, and it is not the side you agree.
With the murder of Charlie Kirk, we are seeing it again. Yes, it is clearly a function of political violence and should be condemned. But as many of us saw the middle Americans, Republican, including the President, “convicted”Radical“For Kirk’s death, while Democrats struggled to celebrate people or justify murder. These people are now happening nowLost your job and lost your jobBy the way. Whereas politicians, pundits and affected by “Bring the temperature down“They themselves were set to the oven at 500 degrees.
Kirk’s death is not the beginning of a new era of political violence as somethingWould like to sayWe have been living in the era of political violence for some time. And many pessimistic Americans feel that the bus is going to deteriorate. And who can blame them? Even though we are very proud to be very individualist, but Americans still follow the leader when it comes to expressing itself.
We look at our phones, computers, televisions and tablets and hate people with disgusting messages that ask us not to hate.
Yes, this is a “both sides” issue. And before you start telling me that the other party has said the worst possible things, I would say that I am sure you have a reason to feel this way. But your side has not been angelic at all.
As a generous, I have seen over the last two decades to compare every Republican politician to the Nazis. President George W. Bush was one of the reasons for the Iraq invasion, but then that insult also applied to John McCain, Mit Romney, Paul Ryan, Liz Cheney and many others who have opposed Donald Trump, he was called a fascist himself. And before you reach the Republican high horse, just think about all the crazy claims you made about President Obama, much less than any other Democrat.
We have converted the massacre of children into a political conspiracy in Sandy Hook that went beyond gun control. We converted Trewon Martin’s death into a political theater which went beyond breed relations. We took a 30 -second video of Nicholas Sandman and used it to present all our feelings about Maga voters on a child, who did nothing wrong. Who led the charge? You know the answer.
We live in an era where before, the most loud and crusest means that you will get the most attention, money and dominance. Let’s take a look at Kirk yourself in a special example. The causes of Mauy Wildfire could be verified before and the damage was assessed, Kirk asked to announce in his show that somehow the fire had to be done with some indigenous airports in any way“Fetish.” Now, you can say that some aerial authorities misleaded water resources, or the government’s failure, which required to investigate. But instead, he had to insult an indigenous religion and stated that it was the reason for the burning of the mau. Why? Because it gave him more money.
When you do not have, the “temperature is raising”. And this is one of the thousands of examples where people with microphones only raise temperatures to get ideas/wealth/clouts.
Does this mean that the man was entitled to a bullet for the neck? no way. But you cannot even show off that the man just wanted to have an honest conversation with people. Kirk was a big star in the competitive world of social media affected. There is a race to be the most loud and offend things. Ben Shapiro was He got angry with the film “Barbie”. Liberals were angry with one John Wayne Playboy Interview in 1970s And “Friends” episodes from the 90s.
People are also criticized for not being derogatory. As the investigation of Kirk’s alleged shooter is going on, some Maga people and left -wing affected Tyler Robinson are claiming Robinson.CleverAn acalyte of nick futen. There are announcements that Kirk was killed for a very mainstream. Is it true? Who knows? Will it get click? Absolutely.
If you really want to bring down the temperature and end this era of political violence, then politicians need to come up with their actions. The news media will have to stop chasing displeasure. And we need to come as a country to allow the population to be scattered on social media as a country. Do they have to do easy work? Is this a solution? I think we can all agree that it is.
Then, let me criticize liberal politicians. We have taken a lot in the Newfound social media personality of California village Gavin Newsom. He just repeats what Donald Trump says and posts from another angle. So I should ask the question of liberals. Is this temperature low?
For all of you, for conservative politicians. I think Kirk’s death is disastrous. Is it good for you to blame “radical leftists” for crime, before we also knew who was the suspect? Do you really think all liberals will shoot a man? Do you want to keep out in this country?
Kirk’s death is not a warning for regular Americans. We know that we have been living in the era of political violence for some time. It is a warning to those politicians, pundits and affected people who are pursuing high ideas, choices, followers and clots. Americans are already killing each other. How much followers do you need before you are increasing the temperature before you feel it?
Jose Joseph is a published writer and graduated from Harvard Extension School and Ohio State University. He is a sea veteran who served in Iraq. He currently lives in Ainahm, California,
