Charlie Kirk killed The University of Utah Valley has held a fresh conversation about the safety of the speakers in the campuses and what can be done to improve it because the conservatives will not scare them from universities.
Both campus and Kirk’s personal security were present in the incident of Wednesday’s debate, but experts say that it is an impossible task that they used to completely secure an external site that is commonly made by the US Secret Service.
After a shot from a distance of 150 yards Kirk was fired to killExperts say that there will be discussion about speakers inside security costs or to increase security costs, but solutions can violate the first amendment without worries.
“From the security point of view, from a security point of view, an area that is large, especially when there are outside buildings, and you will remember that when a shooter successfully shot at Donald Trump, hit him in the ear, it was a secret service, which is going to check the building of every framework. Anti -terrorism and counter -protecting operative.
Officials say 22 -year -old Tyler Robinson Before taking a deadly shot in Kirk, extended a building with a single-bolt action rifle, which was surrounded by hundreds of students from the Utah Valley as part of its “American comeback tour”.
“When you invite outside speakers to come to the campus, something should be considered a danger analysis, what is the possibility of threatening the complex for this speaker, so to speak, due to the dispute around that speech, and if so, a former FBI agent for security and emergency Justice requires a former FBI agent and a former FBI agent for Justis and a former FAFBI for a former Fibi agent and lecturer. Is.”
Ben Shapiro, a conservative firebrand and prominent speaker, like Kirk, insisted that he would not pull back to the dangers.
“I saw a lot of rumors today. I was informed by my team that I have canceled some type of college tour.
Colleges have been struggling with the hazards of violence and violence for years, from large -scale firing to injuries in protests.
As the new school year begins, more than a dozen universities have obtained a threat of shooting or bombs, which has been closed to the premises and the police race has been taken to the spot. The next day after Kirk was killed, at least five historically black colleges and universities Got campus threats,
Experts say that the only definite way to prevent another tragedy like Kirk’s murderers would be that they will have to hold such events in the tightly managed places, indoors.
“Ben Shapiro receives the same anger and hatred, as Charlie Kirk did for someone at his level. And on the other side of the corridor, there are also speakers” who receives these dangers, said, O’Neel said, “but, especially, I think if I need to go a big in a big way, I think you feel that you are going to see it.”
Some complexes can also be said that “the cost of this amount to provide adequate protection for it is going to be the cost, and it is dependent on the student club that is inviting the speaker to come up with additional funds,” Gray said.
“If it is going to spend more than that, they have to cancel the incident or come up with money to support the safety of the incident. Therefore, it is something that is from each university to see how they are going to deal with that type of incident,” he said.
But the issue with all such security questions will be asking the university asking how they can apply changes in such a way that will not violate the first amendment.
While schools have the right and obligation to consider the safety of their premises, free speech advocates say that when there is talk of restricting speech in parts of the premises, concerns arise.
“When we are looking at any time that a school is going to ban free speech in the campus, such as an event, or when someone’s speaker comes in campus or a performance, we want to make sure that the school is implementing its rules equally and sometimes in ways.”
Advocacy groups such as fire say they will be in search that if speakers with a special political approach are limited to a worse part of the campus, while the other side finds better space, or if only one side of the corridor is abolishing expensive security fees from the club university.
“Maybe when an incident is controversial, the school will start paying more money to the students at the safety fee. This happens when my antenna goes up and says, ‘Okay, is it, who says what is controversial and what is not controversial?” Because it is necessary for the first amendment that any restriction on the student free speech should be done according to the material and approach-none criteria, ”Nordastrom said.
“So if we have a administrator who decides that this group speaker is very controversial, then we are going to charge them more for safety in an event than this other group who is just bringing a speaker who is not only a controversial that we think is controversial, who will violate the first amendment, and the school cannot do it,” he said.
