Tulsi Gabard, director of National Intelligence, sowed seeds for the next Magas of the Jeffrey Epstein Pal and ended a dangerous reputation cycle. He has allegedFormer senior government officialDirectedTraitors conspiracyTo reduce President Trump’s 2016 campaign.
Gabbard has not released anything, it proves that claims including 2017House Intelligence Committee ReportQuestioning the assessment of the intelligence community, Russia wanted Trump to win the 2016 election.
This is on obstacles with 2017 conclusion Consensus and bilateral conclusions The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which found that Russia actually tried To influence the campaign in favor of Trump But those efforts did not affect the result.
Gabbard’s claims strengthenLongerMaga is prevalent among supporters that Democrats manipulated information about Russian intervention in the 2016 elections and demanded to destroy Trump’s candidature and then reduce his presidential post.
Gabbard’s unrelated conclusions will return to the Trump administration to cut, similarly the incompetence of Attorney General Palm Bondi is inability to release the Epstein Client List.Trouble the President’s supporters.
Until the Trump administration is ready to create evidence, it is unlikely that enough new information will be discovered at any time to prove the conspiracy of the quantity suggested by Gabbard.
The supporters of Maga will be waiting for the collective arrest and imprisonment of the Obama administration officials who never come. Gabbard, and eventually the conspirators are not coming to justice to the Gabbard, and finally to be left out to explain to Trump.
Gabbard’s powerful claims came in a delicate moment for a Trump administration, already caught in the middle of the storm -like storm about Epstein.
From the beginning, the investigation and public communication about Russian intervention in the 2016 elections were misunderstood. It is important to accept that fact.
President Obama did not have to doRelease the conclusions of the governmentRegarding Russian intervention a month before the 2016 election, the conclusion that provides an air of validity for allegations against Trump.Publicly discussed by supportersHillary Clinton.
The FBI was investigated in the alleged collusion between Trump Abhiyan and Russia.First on flimsy informationEven if the wild claims of Gabbard are not true, and so far there is no evidence that they suggest that the decisions used by parts of the government during and after the 2016 campaign have still left a lot to be desired.
The Trump Abhiyan was a primary victim of the government’s poor decision, but former FBI director James Comi accepted the score a little when he announced.Open an FBI inquiryIn the use of Clinton of an unclaimed email server before the 2016 election.
Democrats gave a message around Russia’s intervention with the 2016 election, either accidentally or deliberately enhanced its role and Trump campaign misrepresented Was involved. But Gabbard is now making his mistakes again with his careless allegations.
Now that both sides have given intelligence information for political purposes, what does it matter to restore confidence in the intelligence community. Gabbard would say that she is leaving her allegations in the name of transparency, but her aggressive claims move forward where the facts are leading and ending an over -story of the government’s plot.
Already, the Democrats are not willing to believe what she is saying, as most Republicans never bought in steel dossier or claimed Trump’s collusion with Russia.
Beyond the trust gap with Democrats, Gabard Maga is setting conditions for a major fall with loyal. After Epstein, this will be the second time when the Trump administration officials accused of a large -scale conspiracy, but are not able to produce evidence to support their claims.
Trump’s chief supporters believe that these conspiracies are real because officers like their leaders, Bondi and Gabbard keep telling them that evidence exists. They will demand action on Gabbard’s allegations, the way they are with Epstein, then left with no alternative, but to assume that the Trump administration is complicated in coverups when no action is taken.
This is a distraction is not the need of Trump. He does well to direct Gabbard to reduce his claim instead of laying him eggs.
Moving forward, the intelligence community, elected officers, justice departments and the government should generally take a lesson from former President Gerald Ford. Ford understood that President Richard would divide the country prosecuted by Richard Nixon and will create more problems than resolving. He decided to allow permission to allow the nation to allow the nation to heal.
The US government should take leave from the demand to prosecute the former government officials, except for matters of the most egoistic crimes supported by the strongest evidence.
Democrats spent many years to go to Jail or go actively to Trump Trying to put Trump in jail For alleged crimes. Gabard intends to do the same in reverse.
It is a bad place for the country, in which the intelligence community is being used against the former authorities and when it is in line with a political purpose, sensitive information is rejected. Whatever the intelligence community does this type of behavior, it will have a cold effect and divides our country.
The Trump administration should grow up in the room and now break this dangerous cycle.
Colin Pascal is a retired army lieutenant colonel who spent most of his career in military intelligence. He is a graduate student at the School of Public Affairs at American University at Washington, DC
