President Trump on Sunday raised the possibility of starting a criminal investigation into the New Jersey village Christi (R) (R) and the 2013 “Bridgate” scam.
Trump threatens an inquiry against his former colleague-Fare Truth in a post on social platform On Sunday, after seeing Christie’s presence on the “this week” of ABC News on Sunday morning.
“Can anyone believe anything that says Mala Chris says? Do you remember that the way he lied about the dangerous and deadly shutdown of the George Washington Bridge to stay out of jail, at the same time, he was sacrificing those who were trying to fight the vicious allegations against him, including a young mother who was trying to fight vicious allegations against him,” Trump wrote in a post.
“Chris refused to take responsibility for these criminal acts,” the President continued. “For justice, perhaps we should start looking at that serious situation again? No one is above the law!”
Christy was never implicated in the 2013 scam, convicting two Christie’s colleagues and sentenced to jail for his role in a plan to punish a local Democratic Mayor, who refused to return Christie’s reunion dialect.
The colleagues were accused of closing the streets to creating traffic problems for Forte Lee’s mayor, NJ faced allegations, including conspiracy, fraud and lack of civil rights.
The prosecutors never demanded criminal allegations against Christie, saying that they could not prove criminal misconduct beyond a proper doubt and could not prove that Christie could not know about the closure. Christie continuously maintained her innocence.
Supreme Court in 2020 Finally sentenced Against the two former colleagues, a unanimous decision, while giving the verdict, while the scheme included deception and corruption, did not violate the federal law.
Trump postponed the verdict at the time, declared it “a full and total boycott” for Christie – his colleagues – and others, while he called “serious misconduct by the Obama justice department”.
Christie Likewise appreciated This decision in 2020, it was a welcome reprimand for an extremist federal prosecutor.
“The case was operated by an American lawyer and the Department of Justice in search of a predetermined and biased outcome,” Christy said in a statement. “Carelessly chasing that result, he violated the swearing in by every member of the Department of Justice.”
