House Judicry Democrats are beginning investigating the transfer of Ghislane Maxwell in a low security jail, with the move argues that “it is a strong presence that it is trying to cover the entire boundary of relations between President Trump and Mr. Epstein.”
Maxwell, a close associate of the deceased financially Jeffrey Epsustein, met with Deputy Attorney General Tod Blanche last month andSit for hours of questions Regarding the work convicted on allegations of child sexual trafficking.
Shortly thereafter, he was shifted out of the convenience and a talhasi, Fla., In Texas.
Rape. Jamie Ruskin (D-MD.), The top Democrat of the panel said that the new, low security in jail “more freedom for prisoners” and “before this extraordinary transfer,” Before this extraordinary transfer, ” [was] Clearly away from the limits of sexual criminals. ,
“These actions create enough concerns that the administration can now attempt to tamper with an important witness, hide the relationship of President Trump with President Trump’s convicts, and to provide false or misleading testimony to the President’s safety to Ms. Maxwell. III.
The letter demands a series of documents related to transfer, as well as a transcript and recording of Maxwell’s meeting with a recording blanch.
The letter has strict guidelines for prison transfer as well as unusual motion, on which Maxwell was introduced.
As a sexual criminal, Maxwell will usually be unqualified to the minimal-security federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, where she now lives, as such features provide “access to the community”.
The restriction is rarely forgiven, something that Ruskin said “takes several levels of reviews that usually takes months to complete,” usually need new evidence, and prisoners usually have to wait for months for an inauguration at such a feature.
The facility that Maxwell has now organized was listed as “as”Best Jail in America to serve time,
“, Ms. Maxwell, however, appears to reduce the entire review process and jump into the queue, getting a place in the Federal Jail Camp (FPC) Bryan within a few days.
The documents obtained by Elisan Gill depicted some BOP classifications of Maxwell, including her sexual criminal statusWas forgiven To allow him to go into a low security facility by the management.
Ruskin demands a list of all administration officers who “knew about, involved, or approved”, as well as all documents and communications related to the case.
He also asks “Ms. Maxwell for any possible benefit, including transfers, changes in imprisonment conditions, forgiveness, commutation, or changes in DOJ posts in ongoing cases.”
Ruskin said the transfer also came as Maxwell is under pressure to testify before the Congress – with the support of both sides with the House Oversite Committee, with the release of a vegetable for its testimony.
“There may be no question that your actions have worked to send a clear message to Ms. Maxwell for any testimony to the Congress and the American public: this administration can punish or reward it as it sees fit for its objectives,” he wrote.
Ruskin similarly asks for a transcript and recording of the blanch interaction with Maxwell, keeping in mind the unusual nature of being a prisoner in the official interview of No. 2 DOJ, a task that is usually directly connected to the case directly for career prosecutors.
“These meetings were highly uncommon for several reasons. Sri Blanches, who served as Donald Trump’s personal criminal rescue lawyer until ten months ago, met with Ms. Maxwell and her lawyer without any line prosecutors. First worked on Epstein prosecution.
“The need for this meeting was reduced from the recent contradictory statements of the DOJ that its intensive review of Epstein files, which allegedly identified the President’s repeated references,” did not reveal the evidence that could predict a third party investigation. “
Blancch earlier said that he would share additional information about whatever he learned. [from Maxwell] in due course. ,
The Department of Justice did not respond to the request of the comment, while the BOP refused to comment on the substance of the letter.
The agency said in a statement, “The Federal Bureau of Jail Bureau directly responds to the members of the Congress and their employees. Outside the honor and honor of the members, we do not share our Congress correspondence.”
