The major medical organizations, which avoid delay in politics, are getting themselves fast with the Trump administration, as the decisions of the health policy are being advanced without the support of scientific consent.
In the last few months, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Secretary Robert F. Under the direction of Kennedy Junior, has made harsh changes in federal guidance on vaccines and this week has given an inappropriate warning about a link between Tilanol and Autism.
Medical Society such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and the American College of Obstatriandian and Gynecologist is publicly broken with the guidance of administration.
Both AAP and AAFP Mated Covid-19 Vaccine Guidance It is particularly contradictory that the Food and Drug Administration announced some time ago; It no longer recommend shots for pregnant women or children without underlying conditions.
The AAP raised the issue with the Advisory Committee on the remake of disease control and prevention with vaccination practices (ACIP), “has a history of spreading the vaccine misinformation to some of its new members.
Last week, ACIP voted for not recommending the combined MMRV vaccine for children under 4 children and further voted to change the Covid-19 vaccination guidance so that the shot administration would be determined by “individual-based decisions”.
These new recommendations investigated from organizations such as the American Medical Association (AMA).
AMA Board member and Lyson Sandra Adamson Fryhoff said that ACIP recommendations left the parents “confused that the best to protect her children and unable to choose MMRV vaccine combined for children under 4 years of age.”
“AMA is concerned that this change not only reduces the choice of parents, but also reflects the dependence of ACIP on selective data in its guidance,” he said.
“We call from administration to ensure ACIP tasks as a reliable, evidence-based body so that families can believe in their recommendations while making important vaccination.”
These groups say that open disagreement with the policies of the administration comes down to protect science, not for partisan politics.
American Medical Association CEO John White told The Hill, “I don’t know if we are opposing a lot. I think the situation is that we are going to stand on science and we speak for science and speak for evidence.”
He said, “I think when we feel that the statement is beyond science or recommendations beyond science, we are going to talk about science and are going to talk and will talk about what expert advice is,” he said.
Many health groups-like American College of Obstatrians and Gynecologist, Society for Matter-Fetal Medicine, and Autism scientists talk to a coalition-Monday when President Trump told pregnant women Not to take tilenol It can be autism in children due to concerns.
No reason links have been confirmed between over-the-counter pain reliever and autism spectrum disorder, and doctors worry that the warning will cause unnecessary damage to pregnant women and fetuses.
“If the administration talks about the standard evidence of gold. Let’s talk about what the gold standard evidence was defined. The data that was talked about in the press conference, and later in the news show, some incidents in the news show are not the gold standard in the context of the Meta review,” said that “said.
The HHS stated that Trump and Kennedy had “promised to practice radical transparency” and “by following science and sharing important public health information, respecting that commitment, as soon as it becomes available, to ensure that families are informed and public health is protected.”
The department said, “These actions represent an unprecedented, comprehensive approach to deepen our understanding of autism. We will continue to follow science, restore faith and provide hope to millions of American families.”
Fighting on scientific evidence was at the center of the recent firing of the Disease Control and Prevention Center (CDC) director.
Former CDC director Susan Monarez told the senators that after telling Kennedy that he would not approve ACIP recommendations without seeing scientific evidence to support his votes. Kennedy said that he cannot be trusted.
,[Kennedy] There was no data or science to indicate. As a matter of fact, we came into an exchange, where I suggested that I would be open to change the schedule of childhood vaccine if there was evidence or science assistant, and he replied that there were no science or evidence associated with the schedule of childhood vaccine, ”said Monarez.
According to experts, the way the current administration is going about health policy, it removes the level of confidence and reliability that may be expected once.
“In the past, the previous administration has always followed a logical, thoughtful, rational, usually evidence-based procedure,” told The Hill by Georges Benjamin, Executive Director of the American Public Health Association for more than 20 years.
He said, “Where he had a chance to take a decision that is political or ideological, even when he followed a process, people could not be happy with their decision, but people understood it that they understood it because of that process,” he said.
“The process we are doing now is not transparent. It is not following any evidence. It is contrary to any supporters of any scientific idea. And it is being presented by, you know, a scientist is being caught in Larch, a scientist here or there, which is in my mind.”
Benjamin said that groups like him still want to become “assistant advisors” for administration.
Benjamin said, “To do this, you must have a companion. And you must have a partner that you don’t have to fear.” “Our federal government has great ability to reduce our ability to work and reduce our ability to reduce viability as organizations.”
