Judge won’t intervene in deportations of migrants to Ghana 

A federal judge said that she would not interfere in the exile of migrants in her domestic countries, where they can face torture and harassment, after which they were after them First sent In Ghana by the US government, said “hands are tied.”

Accepting the orders of other judges, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan said that five plaintiffs in the case are more likely than not torture or harassment when they return to their home countries, but said they lacking jurisdiction.

“The court does not reach this conclusion lightly. It is known about serious consequences that the plaintiff is repaired if he is renovated. And it is worried and disappointed with the circumstances that are being expelled, especially for the government plane, which they are or cut as arthritis. Ruling,

The ruling President presents a win for the administration of Trump that has made deals with other African countries, Including Rwanda, Uganda and EstiniTo send immigrants as part of the President’s collective exile agenda.

14 migrants, most of whom are Nigerians, will be sent from Ghana to their home countries.

Four of the Nigerian migrants said on Monday that their customers were still held in Ghana.

Ghana officials denied the claims of the lawyers, saying that individuals were returned to their home countries.

Ghana’s Government Communications Minister and President’s spokesman Felix Qwake said, “None of them is living in this country. No one is being kept in any camp and no one has been misused.” Interview With the Associated Press on Tuesday.

Oshu said that a Gambian migrant was flown home, while the other 13 persons, all from Nigeria, were sent to their country in a bus.

In the trial, some plaintiffs were sent to Ghana earlier this month and were taken to “Open-Air Detention Facility” surrounded by armed military guards.

Chutkan accepted the administration’s actions in the case.

“In this case, the action of defendants in the United States appears in the United States with proper procedure and even despite the disregard of their obligations to treat those who are subject to human beings. The federal judge said.

Source link

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *