A federal judge allowed employed paternity on Monday Temporary request to prevent medicade funding cuts For group health centers under the provision of new tax and spending package of Republican.
The ruling of US District Judge Indira Talwani is the first known example of the federal judge, which limited the enforcement of any part of the “Big, Beautiful” bill, which has been signed by President Trump. Friday in law,
It was sued a provision a few hours after the employed paternity, which imposes a one-year ban on state medicade payments for health care non-profit institutions that also offers abortion and receive more than $ 800,000 in federal funding in 2023.
Talwani The ruling still allows Administration to implement the provision against other providers, but the employed parent mortal says that it includes almost completeness of the affected institutions.
The judge issued the decision before the government responded, no explanation beyond a brief note that the employed paternity showed him “good reason” to intervene immediately.
The ruling lasts for two weeks, and the judge will rule on whether a long prohibition should be given after the July 21 hearing. Talwani is the appointment of former President Obama.
Emphasizing that the federal law already prohibits federal financing for abortion, the planned paternity argues that this provision unconstitutionally makes the organization single, violates its equal security rights and violates the amount for retaliation for preserved speech of planned paternity.
The group warned that if the judges do not attend immediately, it would have to cut.
The group said in a statement after its decision, “We are grateful that the court worked fast to block this unconstitutional law.”
“Already, in states across the country, providers and health centers have been forced to remove the patients who use Medicids to get basic sexual and reproductive health care because President Trump and his supporters in his Congress have passed a law to prevent them from going into paternity. There are no other providers who can fill the differences that if the ‘dosha of the planned paternity is allowed, there are no other provisions that can fill the differences. Continues. ”
The hill has reached the Department of Justice for comment. This is due to responding to the arguments of employed paternity in the court filing till next Monday.
