NATO faces a crisis of readiness, causing worse than fixation on green policies of the European Union that increases the cost of energy and reduces military preparations.
Spain has rejected NATO proposed 5 percent GDP defense spending target – It is giving priority to green initiative on security instead. The US, a NATO member, is being taken out in a European conflict, if the preventive fails through strength because the Russian bear is threatened.
The Green Passion of the European Union reflects the loss of American solar and solar push and air entry into states such as California is 98 percent of electricity prices between 2011 and 2023, due to dual grid systems, intermittent renewal and remittable gas backup. Germany, Denmark and the United Kingdom have higher electricity rates than California, and California is twice the US National Average,
EU Plan € 1.6 trillion For green initiative by 2030, twice for this € 800 billion Defense budget, military readiness hamstring. The policies mentioned in the 2023 “Greening the Armys” report pushed virtual training to cut emissions, restricting a live-fire drill with habitat and waste rules.
France’s Cazaux Air base, a Natura 2000 site, cannot adequately train pilots. The TNT factory in Sweden faced delay with environmental permits. All this weakens 5 million artillery shells of Russia against the production of Russia annually.
NATO’s readiness requires real -world training, not virtual practice or recycling quota that limits monitoring practice and increase the cost of production. There is no way to spread defense dollar due to low production for higher costs.
The 60-Ton tanks are proposed to electrify or develop hydrogen aircraft-and where will they charge them on the battlefield? There are no viable alternative fuel jets in existence. Spending on these “green” dreams for climate ideology
Due to welfare and green priorities, 3.5 percent of NATO’s 3.5 percent core defense targets have been refused to refuse to spend more than 2 percent of Spain’s own GDP (€ 34 billion in 2025). It forces America to spend 3.2 percent of its GDP, if Russia attacks the burden more shoulder. The green cost of the European Union, powered by climate ideology, burns consumers and terrorists equally.
Russia’s existential threat – a strong preventive by sabotage and cyber attack, demands a strong preventive, not a hundred years from now to avoid a imagined climate destruction. Their green fantasies of changing climate do not make any sense when cope with reality.
China and India are uncontrolled the construction of coal plants, which highlights the futility of the European Union carbon dioxide emissions, which is much lower than the emission benefits of those countries. China and India are building hundreds of coal plants that will be every 50 years, as they are low cost and reliable.
Emits more actual pollution and carbon dioxide (A-line-of-life molecule) than China All other industrial nations jointWhat Europe does in this region, there is little difference on weather or temperature. But it damages the self -defense of Europe.
Remember when it was an option between guns and butter? Well, now in the case of Europe, it is an option between wind and solar or tank.
The US should urge NATO to screen green laws for its defense effects, to end expensive air and solar subsidy and invest in power homes and terrorists to end expensive air and solar subsidy and invest in reliable gas, coal or nuclear reactors. Our NATO colleagues should focus on what is important in the next 20 years, or they will not be in any situation during the future climate season.
America should demand colleagues to prioritize readiness on green dogma. By rejecting expensive renewal and focusing on war-focus, NATO can stop Russia, keep us at home, and ensure safety without a dead battery or empty arsenal.
Weakness invites aggression – power ensures peace.
Frank is the president of Lassi Truth in energy and climate,
