-
Pamela Maldonado
Week 14, the final stop of the regular season. Rivalries and overreactions are everywhere – and the spill gets a little awkward as everyone suddenly remembers they don’t like each other.
This is the most entertaining board of the year.
Three games stood out to me the most because of how they actually play, not how the logos make you feel. This is a card of overreaction and outright mismatch.
choose: Georgia Tech +13.5
Let us go. You know it was going to be on my cards. It’s about how these teams actually make, or fail to make, margins. Let’s get this out of the way first: The “Georgia is better than Pitt” line is just lazy box score fluff without any basis as justification for pushing the line from -13 to -14.5. It ignores the matchups, the styles and why Pitt beat Tech — and Georgia can’t repeat that script.
Georgia’s front isn’t disruptive enough to break down a structure built on the run game led by a mobile quarterback haynes kingThe Bulldogs ranked 121st in pressures with just 16 sacks, one of the most important indicators of whether a favorite can create short field or game-breaking possessions, They just don’t do it,
Flip it: Tech’s run defense grades 12th in the FBS, which makes sense because Georgia’s rushing attack lacks explosive punch. If you can force UGA into 10-12 play drives, they don’t fall apart, they grind. Grinding doesn’t cover more than two touchdowns on the road.
Add the rivalry factor, home energy and GT’s ability to rely on scripted QB runs, play-action and mid-chunk rushing? Georgia’s seven to 10 point victory and covering technique is much more realistic. Supporting the home team is the more intense side, not the emotional one.
choose: Kansas State -16.5
Colorado gave up 422 rushing yards to Utah. This is beyond a blip, it is straight-up structural weakness – the same weakness that strikes you when you enter Manhattan.
K-State has a run identity that doesn’t fluctuate with the quality of the opponent. When the Wildcats get downhill, they take over everything, controlling possession and piling up the scoring opportunities, eliminating any chance for the other team to contest.
The buffaloes turn into that type of playing position. All season long, they have shown the same pattern: If they can’t win on the perimeter, they have no answers. You don’t cover games giving up 8.3 yards per carry for Utah and expect to handle a team with multiple backs and a quarterback who stresses you out on the ground and can pop vertically.
This matchup is trench integrity; The state of Colorado has it, Colorado doesn’t. When a team without a frontrunner steps into that stadium, the game ceases to be a matchup and turns into a physics problem. There is only one side that can escape that equation.
choose: Old Dominion -26.5
This is a violent mismatch. Georgia State has had multiple games with over 400 yards of offense and still finished with 27 points or less. A team that can’t convert yards into touchdowns is a team that gets buried by anyone who scores in bunches – and the Monarchs can score in bunches.
In fact, they are designed to expose every flaw that the state of Georgia has spent three months trying to hide. ODU scores quickly, in pieces and without the need for ideal game conditions. Its offense remains explosive, averaging 9.1 yards per pass overall in the 40s and 50s. Every time ODU sees a fragile defense, the game turns into a track meet and ODU beats its opponent by halftime.
Old Dominion would run Georgia State off the field. I thought of overs 58.5 because I can see the Monarchs scoring it on their own. After being fully juiced, I will take the -110 price bet.
