Dozens of house Democrats voted on Friday to honor Charlie Kirk and oppose a proposal condemning political violence after his assassination in Utah.
Overnomous majority of those 58 MPs represent one of the minority Cocks – Congress Black Cocks (CBC), Hispanic Cocks (CHC) or Asian Pacific American Cocks (CAPAC) – and many said that they “no” vote because they did not want to target the most contradictory political ideas of Kirk.
“If this resolution would have been only to condemn the murder of Charlie Kirk, it would have been my vote. Unfortunately, it was an attempt to use this tragedy as an opportunity to lion his beliefs,” the rape said. Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.), An experienced member of CBC.
“When he was entitled to express and express his beliefs independently, some of them are aggressive to me and many of them for many people and targeted by Vitriel,” he continued. “They do not reflect America’s highest and elite values, nor my Judeo-Christian trust, and I can’t condemn them.”
Gop resolution Easily passed when hitting the floor On Friday, 310 to 58, 38 Democrats voted “current”. An additional 26 MPs, most of them Democrats, did not vote at all.
The bill showed two different messages: an Eulogized Kirk, portraying him as a free-spit champion, who “tried tirelessly to promote unity” and engaged in “respectable, civil discourses”. The other condemned political violence more widely and called upon everyone in the country to “recommend respectable debate” and “respect each other as fellow Americans”.
The Democrats who opposed the remedy said that they support the second message unconditionally. This is the first part with which he took the issue.
Rape Danny Davis (D-IL) said, “I overcome any kind of violence, and so that the resolution with which I am compromising. And I am a strong believer in a free speech.” “But I could not bring myself to agree with many comments that the gentleman did. And when I recognize and believe that you have the right to express what you think, and what you feel, I don’t have to agree.”
On Thursday, the top house Democratic leaders informed their Cocks that they would do it Support Kirk ResolutionBut insisted that they do not press individual MPs to join them. Instead, it will be the vote of Vivek.
Nevertheless, the vote presented a dilemma for the Democrats, which faced a difficult decision: they could support the remedy, in the event that they would be on the record of the record Cancer and their brand activity, which they considered toxic. Or they could oppose it, opening themselves for GOP allegations that Democrats refused to condemn political violence.
He raped Kirk’s attacks on the 1964 civil rights Act and his criticism of Martin Luther King, Junior as his “no” vote.
“I was a child in a separate south. I remember some were not able to go to schools, or some live in the neighborhood, or some eat in the restaurant. And the fact that he would attack the bill that I think I think was such an important piece of change in America, a surprising thing,” Ivey said.
He said, “Dr. King is called ‘terrible’-who was also murdered?
Rape. Alexandria was one of the 58 Democrats who opposed the resolution. She took a step forward after the vote, when she took to the floor and lashed Kirk for some more controversial statements. They included his criticism of the Civil Rights Act and his call for a “patriot”, which was to bail the attacker, who tried to kill Paul Pelosi, the husband of the then speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif).
“Their rhetoric and belief were ignorant and in this resolution as a majority as vocal, ‘away from working tirelessly to work tirelessly to promote unity” was sought to dismiss millions of Americans “,” said Ocasio-Cortze.
Pelosi, for his share, was among the Democrats who refused to cast a vote on Friday’s resolution.
