Canceling telework for disabled feds is a costly mistake — here’s why 

Highly efficient epidemic scientists and analysts at the Disease Control and Prevention Center Email sept received late night at 15 Pre -approval for long -term televisions, including proper housing for the disabled, was canceled the pending explanation of the August Health and Human Services Policy updates.

Decision followed January order Directing agencies to end the most remote workBut disability law does not bend to internal handbook or political winds.

CDC’s move triggers immediate questions under the Rehabilitation Act Demand For personal evaluation and an interactive process, not the blanket rules. After strong pushbacks from unions, CDC This initiative went backat least for now.

Overwaching policy is a major lawsuit that is waiting for it, for which taxpayers will pay as high damage and turnover costs. And before we also believe that the federal records show that well -run distance work provides average benefits.

When an employee requests housing, federal agencies cannot replace personal dialogue with a size-fit-all editing. Equal employment opportunities of commission Own guidance When job duties are allowed, working from home can be a proper housing, and employers should assess each request, not on the basis of case-case, not on the basis of case by case. Executive Order 13164 Every agency is required to maintain effective written procedures for processing housing requests, a point reinforced under the policy guidance of the Commission and its Questions and answers,

Personnel management office This appropriate housing is legally necessary for disabled employees, in which the telework is effective adjustment. When an agency announced that the long -term telework is “no longer considered a proper housing”, as stated in the CDC email and in Follow -up coverageIt reads like a category prohibition that struggles with the obligations and invites complaints that the agency abandons the necessary process. Chief Security of Rehabilitation Act, including Section 501Apply to federal employers regardless of transfer of workplace policies.

Recent appellate decisions underline the risk. In 2024, in DC Circuit Ali V. Regan It is assumed that a tech-or-live approach to the housing presents a jury question because rationality changes the facts, not the agency preferences. Sixth circuit Mosbi-michem decision The decision of a jury confirmed that the Telework Medical Bed Rest had a proper, time-limit habitat for the in-house attorney, as the required tasks for that period could be done from a distance.

Courts do not guarantee telework for every role. They emphasize that agencies are engaged with the duties and boundaries of the employee rather than releasing the blanket like a late night email of the CDC.

Financial risk is real – federal employment in equal opportunity cases, Treatment includes Back pay, front pay, computer compensation, attorney fees and prohibitory relief. The compensatory and punitive damage is overshadowed by law, but there are no back pays, and the law only reduces the exposure when the employer can prove a good-confident interactive process. Dozens of meritorious individual claims can be collected in seven and eight-eight-unconvincing liabilities once back payment periods, fees prizes and compliance surveillance stack. Each dollar increases the operating cost of the agency in avoidable treatment that flows into the appropriation and eventually, public borrowings. This is a bad business for a policy adopted without personal reviews requiring laws.

This stagnation is also that agencies have already learned about the value of the telework when it is managed with discipline. The most recent government assessment It was found that the television eligibility increased by 57 percent of the federal task force in FY 2023 and the agency-reported advantage in recruitment, retention and productivity when television is part of a deliberate hybrid strategy. The same report counted about 7 percent of the workforce in a fully remote positions by the end of 2023, which reflects mission-operated job design rather than ad hoc exceptions.

Evidence A Large random test Investigations by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the hybrid schedule cut about one-third part without damaging the performance, a result that directly talks to agencies competing for rare technical talent. Low attention means less vacancies and low institutional knowledge drainage, both save money.

Taxpayers benefit when the telework discipline align with the decisions of real estate. Congress testimony The government’s accountability office revealed that, during the week of the sample in early 2023, 17 of the 17 buildings at the 24 headquarters lasts for 25 percent or less; Agencies spend about $ 2 billion annually to operate and maintain owned office buildings in addition to about 5 billion dollars to lease space, regardless of use. A smart television bound for footprint reduction can occupy those fixed cost savings without renouncing mission delivery.

In contrast, the yanking housing and forced appearance where the location does not affect the results trades saved for litigation exposure and turnover costs. Return-to-office push has political energy, but it does not withstand mathematics agencies when the budget of buildings is reduced.

The broad debate is clear from years; Analysts Under the well-designed hybrid model, ignoring the empirical benefits in productivity and service distribution, how indiscriminately weakens recruitment, to ruin the return-to-office. CDC’s blanket break takes the worst version of returns-to-office politics and implements a lot of population to protect the Congress. This does not reverse any operations, the risk of losing trained experts, and all but legal quarrels guarantee that the public paid for litigation and then to rest.

The fix is ​​straight and ficklely conservative. Restore the individual review immediately. Open the interactive process again at every stalled or canceled request. Instead of heating and cooling the empty floor, align the workforce posture with a real-estate strategy to catch the savings That government auditors were identifiedUse federal evidence base Two separate government agencies Pass Already gatheredAdd the agency-tier demonstration metrics, and manage telework like any other tool. In this way leaders reduce the risk, maintain talent and protect public purse.

The cancellation of telework housing for disabled employees is not a judicious management. CDC’s blanket break for telework does not give any benefit and guarantees high cost. If the leaders want to protect taxpayers and distribute the results, they should restore valid housing and give data, not optics, drive workforce design.

GLB serves as CEO of Tsipursky, Ph.D., Hybrid Work Consultancy Disaster family specialist And the best-sector “Returning to office and leading in hybrid and remote teams,

Source link

Please follow and like us:
Pin Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *